← Directory

Home Girl

Active

www.homegirl.pl/

Safety criteria— by category, in rubric order

Privacy & data · 20% of score

N/A · 0/8 rated
  • Core content accessible without creating an accountNot assessed— Not assessed
  • No PII collected by default (name, email, IP, location)Not assessed— Not assessed
  • Privacy policy in plain language with a short summaryNot assessed— Not assessed
  • User data not sold or shared with third partiesNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Option to use pseudonym or alternative nameNot assessed— Not assessed
  • No auto-save of form content (shared device risk)Not assessed— Not assessed
  • Opt-in (not opt-out) consent — granular and revocableNot assessed— Not assessed
  • End-to-end encryption used where applicableNot assessed— Not assessed

Safety by design · 20% of score

N/A · 0/6 rated
  • Quick-exit button present (redirects discreetly to neutral page)Not assessed— Not assessed
  • Content warnings before sensitive or triggering contentNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Disguised notifications or discreet app icon optionNot assessed— Not assessed
  • No "people you may know" feature that could expose users to abusersNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Two-factor authentication availableNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Safe alternative contact options supported (distinct from personal accounts)Not assessed— Not assessed

Agency, consent & participatory design · 15% of score

N/A · 0/7 rated
  • User controls what information is public vs. privateNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Multiple content formats available (video, text, audio)Not assessed— Not assessed
  • Self-paced use possible — no forced sequential flowsNot assessed— Not assessed
  • User can opt out of tracking and cookiesNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Survivors co-designed AND co-iterated — not consulted once onlyNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Tool does not force a single pathway (e.g. 'call police' only)Not assessed— Not assessed
  • Feedback mechanism exists for users to flag issues or suggest contentNot assessed— Not assessed

Accessibility, equity & inclusion · 15% of score

N/A · 0/9 rated
  • Available in more than one languageNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Free to use — no paywall for core contentNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Mobile-friendly / responsive designNot assessed— Not assessed
  • WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility compliance documentedNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Gender-neutral, non-stigmatising language throughoutNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Covers intersectional forms of GBV — not single-issue onlyNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Works on low bandwidth / poor connectivityNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Not geographically restricted in accessNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Mitigates risks for users on shared or monitored devicesNot assessed— Not assessed

Transparency & accountability · 10% of score

N/A · 0/6 rated
  • Creator / organisation clearly identified on the toolNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Last update date visible (signals active maintenance)Not assessed— Not assessed
  • Scope and limitations clearly stated — including what the tool cannot doNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Funding sources disclosedNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Methodology publicly documentedNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Content aligned with global GBV/HP standards and reviewedNot assessed— Not assessed

Tone & trauma-informed UX · 10% of score

N/A · 0/5 rated
  • No graphic or violent imagery — no sensationalised depictions of violenceNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Uses "survivor" rather than "victim" language throughoutNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Warm, non-judgmental, validating tone throughout the interfaceNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Visuals are empowering and gender-diverse — not stereotypingNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Does not minimise or hierarchise different forms of abuseNot assessed— Not assessed

AI & algorithmic ethics · 5% of score

N/A · 0/5 rated
  • Clearly states if and how AI is used in the toolNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Clearly states what AI is usedNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Provides details of how user's inputs are processed/ saved/ shared with third parties.Not assessed— Not assessed
  • Chatbots / automated tools clearly identify themselves as non-humanNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Human escalation pathway available when AI cannot safely respondNot assessed— Not assessed

Sustainability & feminist tech ethos · 5% of score

N/A · 0/3 rated
  • Led or co-led by women, gender-diverse people, or Global Majority organisationsNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Openly licensed — can be used, remixed or adapted by othersNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Clearly states compliance with feminist values or trauma-informed design or survivor-centred approachNot assessed— Not assessed

See the Transparency page for how the weighted score and bands are calculated.

Visit www.homegirl.pl/ ↗ (opens in a new tab)Report an issue
Safety scoreNot yet scored

Audience

Countries

Languages

About this tool

Creators

Funding sources

Tool type

GBV issues

Review status

Not yet reviewed